Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Pretty much all Samsung users, especially the ones who buy flagship Galaxy phones, complain that they don't want the company's native Exynos chip on their phone—and understandably so.

Exynos vs Snapdragon. Which one to choose? This question is in the minds of all Android smartphone users. Read on find out which one is suitable for you. The Samsung Exynos vs Qualcomm Snapdragon is a competition that has been going on for many years now. While it could be argued that public perception favours Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, it cannot be denied that Samsung has made a lot of innovation when it comes to its own Exynos chipsets.

Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more. IP68 rating, wireless charging. But one traditional source of contention is that a Galaxy S phone in one region can have worse performance, battery life, and image quality than the same device in another market. This discrepancy exists because Samsung has usually offered two different chipsets in the Galaxy S series, depending on the region. Our own testing showed that the Snapdragon variant offered better multi-core CPU performance and much better graphical performance, while the two were virtually tied in single-core benchmarks. The Snapdragon model has been the better choice for gamers in recent years owing to this performance advantage and broader compatibility when it comes to emulation. The two SoCs were similarly matched in terms of CPU performance, with the Snapdragon variant edging ahead for single-core performance and the Exynos model pulling ahead on multi-core scores. However, we found that the Exynos model offered better sustained performance in some tests. The situation seems to be more favorable for Exynos variants when it comes to endurance. The Exynos version of the Galaxy S21 Ultra repeated this feat, lasting almost half an hour longer than the Snapdragon version in our Speed Test G endurance test. In saying so, we also found that the Exynos variant throttled performance sooner. We tested the battery life of the Galaxy S22 Ultra variants as part of our stress test, finding that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 version lasted for minutes versus minutes for the Exynos variant. Our own Rob Triggs suggested that the difference between the two figures was close enough to be within the margin of error.

Snapdragon chips have generally held the upper hand over Exynos processors, particularly when it comes to GPU performance. Deepika Stuns In Casuals.

Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption , but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones.

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more. Look across your suite of benchmarks, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 model comes out ahead of the Exynos Galaxy S24 in every test. The exception is Solar Bay, which uses ray tracing. The two models score virtually identically here, suggesting a ray tracing bottleneck in the Adreno architecture. Both throttle back roughly simultaneously, but the Snapdragon model falls furthest from its peak potential. It falls to just

Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Both chipsets this year are more similar than ever, both now sporting similar CPU configurations, and both being produced on a new Samsung 5nm 5LPE process node. The single X1 cores in the Snapdragon clocks in at 2. Alongside the X1, we find three Cortex-A78 cores at 2. Although we had been expecting 8MB L3 cache flagship SoCs this year, it does look like Qualcomm opted to remain at 4MB for this generation — but at least the company dons the X1 core with the maximum 1MB L2 cache configuration. The differences are in the details:. The X1 cores on the Exynos clock slightly higher at up to 2. The Cortex-A55 cores are also quite aggressive in terms of frequency as they now reach 2. Most importantly, the X1 cores here only feature KB of L2 cache, which is a bit weird given the all-out-performance philosophy of the new CPU. Much like the Snapdragon, the L3 cache also falls in at 4MB rather than the 8MB we would have hoped for this generation, however Samsung does surprise us with the usage of an estimated MB system level cache, up from the 2MB design in the Exynos

Www map quest

The chipset also has a couple of features in common with the brand-new Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC, such as super-fast image generation and Zoom Anyplace camera tech. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. It does not account for other improvements in the SoC or power consumption. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Samsung instead went with Exynos for global devices that generation. Entertainment 2 hours ago. Which one to choose? Interestingly, in contrast to the Exynos chipsets, there aren't any major jumps from one generation to the next. In fact, Samsung is the only major Android company in the world that not only designs its chips but also manufactures them at its own foundry. We tested the battery life of the Galaxy S22 Ultra variants as part of our stress test, finding that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 version lasted for minutes versus minutes for the Exynos variant. However, one thing is for sure: Qualcomm has always scored ahead of the same generation Exynos chipset in every Samsung device except in the case of the Exynos Most smartphone companies buy third-party chips instead of making their own due to the extensive costs and expertise required to set up research and manufacturing facilities. In normal usage, they are more or less equally comparable, and the difference in results between these chipsets can similarly be found between two results run on the same device in different conditions. The Exynos version of the Galaxy S21 Ultra repeated this feat, lasting almost half an hour longer than the Snapdragon version in our Speed Test G endurance test.

Samsung updates its flagship lineup of smartphones yearly, and every year, there's always one contentious issue: which is better, Snapdragon or Exynos?

Dxomark tested both Galaxy S22 Ultra variants and dished out the same overall score. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Given that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has its own fair share of problems, it's not too surprising to see it fall behind a little bit in the single-core department. This marked the first time since that the Galaxy S line is powered entirely by one processor. You may also notice that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is missing: this is likely because of the problems that the Snapdragon faced. Halting the development of Exynos would be guaranteeing that Samsung phones will never become as efficient and optimized as iPhones. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Exynos vs Snapdragon Processors - Which one is the better choice you? The Exynos processor is made by Samsung in-house for use with its own Samsung smartphones, with some exceptions. There are many other ways to measure a chipset, and Geekbench measures one sole aspect of a device. This standard promises the same video quality with smaller file sizes, with Netflix already supporting this more efficient format. IP68 rating, wireless charging.