Ublock origin lite

I'm really happy that Gorhill has listened to feedback on the branding and explanation of this, and added back in the ability to "opt in" to extended permissions on individual sites. Thank you for your work, and I'm sorry if my comments in the preview HN thread came off as overly hostile, because given the original comments you made about MV3, ublock origin lite, I couldn't imagine ublock origin lite sort of outcome. I hope that you or someone else still works to release an MV3-compatible "Full site permissions" version of uBlock as well, since I think there ublock origin lite a lot of potential options for improvement by using declarativeNetRequestFeedback, and it's certainly more convenient to not have to opt-in.

So I was actually trying out uBlock Origin Lite [1] the MV3 compatible version as my daily driver for the past week and I must say it's not that bad. I really wouldn't want to opt into every single site I visit. Most websites don't bother with antiadblock because current adblock can handle that. Once most people are using crippled ad blockers that can't bypass antiadblock, they'll implement the antiadblock. There isn't much incentive right now to make ad delivery that can't be blocked in mv3.

Ublock origin lite

A permission-less content blocker. Blocks ads, trackers, miners, and more immediately upon installation. To grant extended permissions on a given site, open the popup panel and pick a higher filtering mode such as Optimal or Complete. The browser will then warn you about the effects of granting the additional permissions requested by the extension on the current site, and you will have to tell the browser whether you accept or decline the request. If you accept uBOL's request for additional permissions on the current site, it will be able to better filter content for the current site. You can set the default filtering mode from uBOL's options page. If you pick the Optimal or Complete mode as the default one, you will need to grant uBOL the permission to read and modify data on all websites. Keep in mind this is still a work in progress, with these end goals: - No broad host permissions at install time -- extended permissions are granted explicitly by the user on a per-site basis. Google doesn't verify reviews. Learn more about results and reviews.

Could not find what happened, but if it's the forum known for enabling harassment, and if IA did something bad to this site owner, then I find no problem. Right, that's precisely what I mean. Best ad blocker for Facebook, ublock origin lite, YouTube, Twitch.

IMHO it's best to assign a new name and my first suggestion is uPrivacy. It's one of the unique characteristics and identity of uBO among many such as superior performance. Well, if I understand correctly neither performance will be a unique characterisitics in MV3 as now filtering is done by browser. Whatever the intention was, in my country it turned out people's perception is: "Oh, relieved. And as gorhill had to clarify, others take "Minus" as a sign of negative feelings. My rationale for the name uPrivacy is:. Other candidates I think of are uFilter, uDefender, uProtector, etc.

Fast and lean. It blocks ads, trackers, coin miners, popups, annoying anti-blockers, malware sites, etc. There are many other lists available to block even more. Hosts files are also supported. You may easily unselect any preselected filter lists if you think uBO blocks too much.

Ublock origin lite

On April 3, , Hill transferred the uBlock project to Chris Aljoudi due to frustrations with dealing with requests as the project's popularity increased. I will keep maintaining my version and share with whoever care to use it because it guarantees the tool will match what I want out of it. In response, uBlock's founder Raymond Hill stated that "the donations sought by ublock. In July , ublock. As of January [update] , the uBlock Origin Chrome extension had over 35 million active users and the Firefox version had over 7 million active users. The popular filter lists EasyList and EasyPrivacy are enabled by default. The extensions are capable of importing hosts files and a number of community-maintained lists are available at installation. Some additional features include dynamic filtering of scripts and iframes and a tool for webpage element hiding. Site-specific switches to toggle the blocking of pop-ups , strict domain blocking, cosmetic filtering, blocking remote fonts, and JavaScript disabling were also added to uBlock Origin. In November , a uBlock Origin user reported a novel technique used by some sites to bypass third-party tracker blocking.

Retro naturist photos

Thank you for your work, and I'm sorry if my comments in the preview HN thread came off as overly hostile, because given the original comments you made about MV3, I couldn't imagine this sort of outcome. Given all this, the Chrome team continues with the change citing increased performance when using service workers. If not, why? MasterKia Sep 12, Collaborator. Now I'm using FF as my daily driver and only boot up chromium when there is a page rendering issue. Enough that Chrome may lose its position as the top browser. Procedural filters are applied at requestAnimationFrame time, and probably it does not fire when the page is not visible, which is good since we do not want procedural filters to consume CPU cycle if the result is not going to be visible anyway. The problem people have is the destruction of the more powerful APIs to permit the fine control that UBO requires, to do the job proper. Open source with public license GPLv3 For users by users. Especially if you are using a "fast" telescope. Can you share more information on this? And it sounds vaguely like "neutered", which is what MV3 attempts to do to ad-blockers. At a glance, those seems like good things to introduce to global organizations especially foundations that is supposed to be represented by the whole world. If ad blockers are less capable that will only help Google's competitors, not Google.

Upon installation, uBOL immediately blocks ads, trackers, miners, and more without requiring any additional permissions. If desired, users can add more rulesets by visiting the options page accessible through the popup panel. Unlike other content blockers, uBOL is entirely declarative and does not require a permanent process for filtering.

Thanks for the suggestion, I've been looking for something like that. There is no point complaining about it, it's just not for you, it's meant for another kind of users -- you do not have to use it. I also have no plans to return to the MV2 version. Maybe uBOL was still enabled when I thought it was disabled. It has the connotation of being "Lite" since they're low-mass particles. Firmwarrior on Sept 23, root parent next [—] haha, oh man For context: Reddit awards don't give the recipient anything except the ability to browse Reddit without any banner ads, and access to a special forum. Sounds like a plus for manifest v3 then. You are right about requiring more case studies. MichaelCollins on Sept 20, parent prev next [—]. Why would they develop a new extension API that still allows you to block ads at all? As someone who never heard of "Thriving Movement" nor "DEI-type initiaives" before, it seems to be around making the workplace Wikimedia Foundation more diverse, equal and inclusive. Is this so hard to see? For the time being, UBO Lite does not support cookie consent blocking. So we need to build something external to the browser that will detect uBlock Origin asking for permissions and automatically grant them : Edit: doesn't this mean that any site you visit will get a chance to track you the first time, until you manage to click to grant permission? Because extensions can, for example, still inject arbitrary javascript if those permissions are in the manifest.