tug normative values

Tug normative values

Background and purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is widely employed in the examination of elders, but definitive normative reference values are lacking. This tug normative values provided such values by consolidating data from multiple studies. Methods: Studies reporting TUG times for apparently healthy elders were identified through the on-line search of bibliographic databases.

Purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade ages , , , years were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health.

Tug normative values

The TUG test provides a measure of global ambulation skills and its total score has been successfully related with functionality and other important health variables in older adults. Reliable norms are needed for adults 50 years and older that allow the early identification and intervention in motor disturbances. The study was carried out with adults from Galicia and Valencia living in the community. A total of Spanish community-living participants, aged from 50 to 90 years and functionality preserved were assessed through the implementation of a cross-sectional design. Health, comorbidity, physical activity, cognitive status, functionality measures and TUG test scores were obtained. TUG scores were successfully predicted by age and gender, and significantly correlated with cognitive status and comorbidity. TUG norms were calculated by age-group for women and men. TUG normative scores were below 13 s and slightly lower in men. Normative scores for women and men were lower than those proposed in studies carried-out in our context. Our norms showed risk reference scores close to those obtained by meta-analytical procedures.. Se calcularon los valores normativos para el TUG por grupo de edad para varones y mujeres.

Schoene, S. Gill-Body, K. J Am Geriatr Soc, 39pp.

Toll-Free U. Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life. Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. Instrument Details. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.

Toll-Free U. Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life. Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process. Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us! Caixeta, G. Campbell, C.

Tug normative values

Simple test used to estimate the risk of falls. The Timed Up and Go test, also known as the TUG test, is a simple evaluative test used to measure your functional mobility. The TUG test measures how long it takes you to stand up, walk a distance of 10 feet, turn, walk back, and sit down again. The TUG test is most often used in physical therapy to give your therapist an idea of how safely you can move around.

Dolphin costume

The funders played no role in the designing, conducting, or reporting of this study. One-year Webinar Package - Unlimited Access. Pondal and Del Ser 14 excluded Keywords: TUG test; normative reference values; physical activity; primary care. Eur Geriatr Med, 9 , pp. Although previous studies showed significant associations with functionality, health and physical activity measures, 13—16 we consider that these relationships were not found in our study because the ceiling effect as a consequence of the preserved functionality of the sample. Brown, K. Keogh, F. Women with scores below 6 points and men with scores below 5 points in the IADL-Lawton were excluded in order to obtain norms from participants with preserved functionality. Huang, S. Lawton, E. Texto completo. View more projects. Hurks, J.

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure.

Schenkman, M. Our norms were closer to the reference values for older adult population reported by Bohannon 11 in his meta-analysis. Mathias, S. Eur Geriatr Med, 9 , pp. Charlson, P. J Chronic Dis, 3 , pp. Ferrucci, C. Podsiadlo, S. Knudsen, A. Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? The TUG score was successfully predicted by age 11,14,20 and in line with some previous studies, 14,19,20 gender was revealed as a predictive variable of TUG test scores, showing that women get higher scores in TUG test and therefore generally are affected by a greater slowing in motor performance.

0 thoughts on “Tug normative values

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *