Tamron 70 300 vc portrait
This has been a very welcome addition to the market, because the Nikkor had been alone price-wise, and third-party options were not up to the standards.
In August of Tamron released an updated version of its mm telephoto zoom lens, with a few notable improvements. The first and most obvious is the addition of Vibration Control VC technology, to reduce the effect of camera shake and provide sharper images. The lens appears to be completely redesigned, with 4 additional lens elements and a new autofocus system. The lens was designed to fit full-frame film and digital SLR cameras, and on APS-C digital cameras, provides an equivalent field of view of mm Canon or mm Nikon and others. This lens isn't a "constant" lens, in that as you increase the focal length, both the maximum and minimum aperture sizes decrease. The following table reflects the change in apertures as you zoom the lens:. Sharpness With the lens mounted on the sub-frame Canon 7D, the lens produced some exceptionally sharp images, more towards the ''wider'' end of 70mm than when zoomed in fully to mm.
Tamron 70 300 vc portrait
Both have built in image stabilization and have a low dispersion glass element to improve image quality. Both have full frame coverage. But is it as good? I also used an EOS 5D to look at the image quality at the edges and corners of the full 35mm frame. After both "real world" and resolution target testing, on both APS-C and full frame sensors and looking at several hundred images I came to the following conclusions: The Canon and Tamron zooms are pretty much equal in terms of sharpness in the center of the image at all focal lengths from 70mm to mm. Both are very good for this class of lens. They're not quite up to prime lens levels of sharpness, but they can be surprisingly close. Both lenses are sharp wide open and improve a little on stopping down. However they can both be used wide open without worrying too much about image quality. Technically, the Tamron overall sharpness probably peaks at around f8 center and f11 corner at all focal lengths, but the difference between wide open and stopped down is quite small and shooting wide open and hence with a faster shutter speed or lower ISO setting will often give the best results. At mm the Tamron is sharper in the corners of the image than the Canon, especially when shooting with a full frame sensor, though there is still a difference in the corners of the APS-C frame.
The Canon's advantages include modestly lighter weight, better AF accuracy, less vignetting and less pincushion distortion through mm.
Riding above the typical mm focal length range found in kit and general purpose lenses, the mm or similar focal length range is extremely popular - easily covering the range I typically recommend to someone interested in a second lens. Note: I don't consider the gap between 55mm and 70mm to be significant. Either way, the difference between 70mm and mm is obvious. And the overall range is useful. Generating a list of uses for a mm lens is a daunting task it includes family life, vacations, landscapes, travel, wildlife , but the relatively narrow aperture typically found in this class of lens removes low light action from its uses list. Here is a comparison of the aperture step down between the Tamron and some Canon telephoto lens models. Aside from being narrow at the long end, the 's variable max aperture means that manual exposures utilizing a wide open aperture will not stay consistent over the focal length range.
Tamron has been on a tear in the last few years on the Sony FE full frame E-mount platform, releasing one high-performing, reasonably priced zoom after another. This started with the very well received mm F2. Thus far Tamron has followed a fairly fixed formula: their zoom lenses on Sony all have weather sealing, good but not exceptional builds, outstanding autofocus capabilities, a universal 67mm filter thread, no switches on the barrel, and no VC Vibration Compensation, their name for an optical image stabilizer. Prefer to watch your reviews? Check out either the long format definitive review or shorter standard video reviews below:.
Tamron 70 300 vc portrait
A clump of whitespirebirch tree trunks provides three-dimensionality within a narrow range of colors. Long focal lengths isolate a small area of view - offering a wide range of compositions of a scene visible from a single position. Sometimes all it takes to be a winner is to raise your arms when the picture is taken. Fields at the top of mountains allow for an undistracting sky background. Clumps of crocuses are not hard to find, but finding the right composition to capture them in is much more difficult.
Gnome sequencer 2
Extension tubes will increase the maximum magnification somewhat. In several of the images I took, we really couldn't tell any difference between the Tamron and the Canon L - it even came to the point that we couldn't remember which images were from which lens, they were that close. From mm and on, there's significant pincushion distortion in the corners. In any case, I don't have experience with either lens, so I couldn't tell you. VC is working very good, I tend to like it better than nikon's VR Image above was from my Sigma on the Nikon D90, cropped. I had a very hard time picking this lens vs the Nikon mm VR. Both lenses are sharp wide open and improve a little on stopping down. These were taken using a sturdy tripod and the best shot of a sequence chosen since atmospheric effects can sometimes blur images. Already have a WordPress. Circular but very nervous with accentuated edges at 70mm, but gets pleasantly smooth at mm. Riding above the typical mm focal length range found in kit and general purpose lenses, the mm or similar focal length range is extremely popular - easily covering the range I typically recommend to someone interested in a second lens. It is a large lens but is compensated by results.
In August of Tamron released an updated version of its mm telephoto zoom lens, with a few notable improvements. The first and most obvious is the addition of Vibration Control VC technology, to reduce the effect of camera shake and provide sharper images.
I bought this lens 2 days ago and I am in love with it already! The Tamron shows slightly less chromatic aberration and slightly better sharpness in the corner though. You do hear whizzing sounds from the lens when the VC is in action but come on, that doesnt really matter! The new system allows for full-time manual focusing, allowing the user to adjust autofocus results by simply turning the focusing ring. The ring takes about ninety degrees to go from 70mm to mm, and does not show any signs of zoom creep. Not a deal-breaker though. Please share this page! On all settings, the Tamron edged out the Canon fairly easily, and the Canon was excellent to start with! Coma Coma is an important requirement in astrophotography and usually affects the corners of most lenses. So bought one. It will be published as soon as we get a chance to review it, sorry for that, but we get lots of spam with malicious links. Where this lens stands out is focus accuracy. It is useful when you need a long focal length, such as for travel when you want to take shots of the things you see on your trip.
I am sorry, this variant does not approach me. Perhaps there are still variants?