Nikon 18 105 vs 18 140

Be the first. Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision.

Group Since Sep 28, Save Cancel Drag to set position! Overview Discussions Photos Members Map. Sorry for any cross posting I have a Nikon D with kit lens. I'd like a little more flexibility in the range and am considering getting an

Nikon 18 105 vs 18 140

When the D came out and I started using it with the kit I was stunned at how soft the images were. I thought for sure I had gotten a bad copy of the kit so I went down to the camera store and tried a different one and then I tried another and they were all equally bad. I popped on my favorite prime lens and the difference was huge- Grand Canyon huge. In the past I have not typically been a kit basher, there are those out there that say the kit lens is horrible, just buy the body and get a prime or other, better quality, lens and I often disagree with this approach, especially for people new to DSLRS. After my experience I advised anyone buying the D to skip the and get the or consider some alternatives Recommended Lenses for Nikon DX Cameras. The is a better lens, it out performs the easily but especially now that Nikon has dropped their AA filter, a filter that actually blurs the image slightly to avoid moire, in the D and now the D - they really needed a good lens to include with these cameras. Is the that lens? It is or nothing. So how does it compare to the ? The is on the left and the is on the right in all samples below.

I've used it on the D, and it was quite happy there.

Hi Folks, I have been looking for an upgrade lens for lightning photography. Have been using the mm kit lens with my D Will these lenses work on the D? Is there anything I should be aware of before making an upgrade? One YouTube reviewer mentioned that the mm can have lens creep. Most of the time my camera is pointed upward toward the sky.

Forums New posts Search forums. Media New media New comments Search media. Members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts.

Nikon 18 105 vs 18 140

Forums New posts Search forums. Resources Latest reviews Search resources. Log in Register. Search titles only.

Unlimited lawn care

No reviews yet Be the first. I cannot say that has been an issue for me. At the longest end of the lens you get the narrowest angle of view. I've had really good experience with this lens on my D, in terms of both optical quality and range. Before I bought the , I did buy a used from Craigslist. Nikon F. I've used both, and much prefer the Lens creep is not going to work. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. This allows you to attain better, softer looking bokeh in your photos. Padmacara Posted 7 years ago. Help us by suggesting a value. I have used the on my D The sharpness result from the DxOMark set of metrics.

For a full list of the technical specifications please refer to the product manual.

I'd be a little cautious of older ones, because quality control and sample variation seem to have been a little low on some, and repairs difficult. However, with age and use any zoom can develop creep. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. I would use the money for a mm, which will be great for landscapes and will give you more options than the extra few mm on the would. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. I am thinking about the extra reach of the for the landscape. The transmission result from the DxOMark set of metrics. I travel a lot did until lockdown! Thanks for signing up! Apart from small variations modern lenses are sharp when we do our part. Ugly Hedgehog.