Modern warfare 1 vs 2

Log In Sign Up. What do you need help on?

Log in. Top Bottom. Hide Images. Gaming Forum. Gaming Hangouts. EtcetEra Forum. EtcetEra Hangouts.

Modern warfare 1 vs 2

It's what sprung the franchise into global dominance and made it the most recognizable name in the industry. The story modes, while not long or expansive, are a half a dozen hours of adrenaline, thrill, and pure entertainment. And 's MW2 was equally well-received. These two re-imaginings feature strong campaigns right up there with the best in the series, but which is the best? The first thing to consider for both of these games is legacy. Both titles act as re-imaginings and retellings of an already established universe to a new generation. To make matters harder , most players of the original titles grew up with those games and have fond nostalgic memories attached. Pleasing those fans is a tall order. Fortunately, both remakes live up to their predecessors in this regard. The most important thing for any Call of Duty campaign is the combat. Fortunately, both games excel at this. All the core gameplay cues are done exceptionally well. The game captures the weight of the guns and the shooting mechanics perfectly. Everything feels more realistic and grounded, especially player movements like crouching, crawling, and sprinting.

ShawBrothers 14 years ago 3 I modern warfare 1 vs 2 MW2 sp campaign a lot better but you will be lost with the characters in the story if you never play the first MW. MW launched with 10 regular MP maps add to it ground wars and gun fight maps and they added some remakes of fan favorites later down the line as free DLC. At launch, without a doubt MW was better.

The multiplayer portion of Modern Warfare 2 officially came out on October 28, so fans have had around two months to form an opinion on the game. It features a new perk system, different gameplay mechanics, and a completely redone UI, but not all changes were met with a positive reception from the Call of Duty player base. Some fans have now listed out the exact reasons they prefer Call of Duty: Modern Warfare to its sequel. A Reddit user named Jheeezeeesud shares an extensive list of reasons for believing Modern Warfare to be more refined than Modern Warfare 2. Before jumping into the issues, Jheeezeeesud mentions that they prefer the maps in MW2 when compared to its prequel, but states that Modern Warfare was better in several key areas. They state that using killstreaks was much faster in Modern Warfare , in addition to the smoother movement mechanics. They mention that utilizing field upgrades like Dead Silence was simpler due to the lack of an activation animation, while also complaining about the ADS speed of guns in Modern Warfare 2 whenever users have attachments equipped.

This is our single-player campaign review for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. For our thoughts on PvP, check out the multiplayer review. In five years time when we discuss Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, there will be no confusion as to which of the two games that share that name people are referring to. The quality of this story is a substantial step down from its predecessor; where Modern Warfare examined the human stories that emerge from military occupation and lightly assessed sacrificing a piece of your own morality in order to protect the civilian world, Modern Warfare 2 is more interested in broader, shallower action. The result is paper-thin, gung-ho characters and a conclusion that can be predicted from barely 30 minutes in. Expect less Kathryn Bigelow and more Michael Bay vibes for this chapter. As ever, Call of Duty is on the cutting edge of graphics technology, and so looks incredibly handsome from practically every angle. Weapon handling is precise and punchy, and the visual, physical, and particularly audio feedback is in a league most FPS games can only dream of. Praise should certainly be laid on the sniper and assault rifles in particular, which feel the best they ever have.

Modern warfare 1 vs 2

It's what sprung the franchise into global dominance and made it the most recognizable name in the industry. The story modes, while not long or expansive, are a half a dozen hours of adrenaline, thrill, and pure entertainment. And 's MW2 was equally well-received.

671 saatleri

Assuming you treat that as part of the overall package which I do then I think Modern Warfare is the better of the two and one of the top three in the franchise's history. Mindfreak Member. MW and WZ hit different during covid. Main Quest. I only played and didn't like it that much, so I feel like I dodged a bullet by missing the sequel. The missions are varied and engaging, the characters are likable, and the story is solid. PieMastr 14 years ago 5. And 's MW2 was equally well-received. Oct 28, 5, Most weapons felt the same and the levels weren't fun to play in. Oct 29, 18, PieMastr 14 years ago 5 Both are amazing games so get both. Getting both is the correct answer. MW

If you want the highest frame rates, you need the best settings for Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2.

Gaming Hangouts. Give me Treyarch-style gameplay any day of the week. It was intense as hell and overtuned to the point of actually being hilariously fun because of how overtuned it was. Oct 27, 4, EtcetEra Forum. Modern Warfare 2 back in was all about chaos, mayhem, broken weapons, constant killstreaks, insane tactics, glitching, and otherwise a full round of pandemonium every single time you played. The original MW2 already featured twists and turns, and this game adds on to it. It stands at about ten hours and its action-packed. Nov 6, Deleted member RoKKeR Member. I also disliked the maps. Razgriz-Specter Member.