Mg4 ancap

Applicable to all MG 4 grades sold in Australia and New Zealand, mg4 ancap electric hatchback received scores of 83 per cent for Adult Occupant Protection, 86 per cent for Child Occupant Protection, mg4 ancap, 75 per cent for Vulnerable Road User Protection pedestrians and cyclistsand 81 per cent for Safety Assist technology.

The MG4 is the first MG to receive this rating under the recent rating criteria, and did so despite the autonomous emergency breaking system being unable to detect pedestrians while the car is in reverse. MG4 received high scores in a few of the 4 key areas. This all-electric hatchback is fitted with various collision detection and avoidance technologies to help it achieve these results, including:. The AEB performed well when tested against scenarios emulating cyclists and a few car-to-car collision tests. But the system was not available to detect pedestrians when the vehicle was in reverse. Lane-keep assist also showed good performance in various tests and was adequate in emergency lane-keeping situations.

Mg4 ancap

The MG 4 Electric is fitted with a range of collision avoidance technologies including autonomous emergency braking, active lane support, and fatigue monitoring. Mixed results were seen in AEB Pedestrian test scenarios. AEB Backover functionality, designed to detect and respond to pedestrians in reverse, is not available. The lane support system fitted to the MG 4 Electric showed Good performance in lane keep assist test scenarios, and Adequate performance in the more critical emergency lane keeping scenarios. Structurally, maximum points were awarded to the MG 4 Electric for its protection of adult occupants in the side impact and oblique pole tests. The MPDB test - which also assesses vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility — showed that the MG 4 Electric presented a relatively low injury risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle, with a modest penalty of 0. The MG 4 Electric is however not fitted with a centre airbag or similar countermeasure to prevent contact between front seat occupants, and prevention of excursion movement to the other side of the vehicle was assessed as Adequate for the vehicle-to-vehicle scenario, and Poor for the vehicle-to-pole scenario. Strong scores were seen for the protection of child occupants in the front and side impact crash tests. Full details on the safety performance of the MG 4 Electric can be viewed here. Something went wrong. Media Contact. MG 4 Electric Aug - onwards. Meet the family.

How is car safety changing? Drive for Brands.

The budget-friendly EV scored maximum points for protecting adult occupants in the side impact and pole tests, with a mix of good to marginal results in the full-width frontal and frontal offset tests. Penalties were applied for excessive forward movement of the rear passenger dummy in the full-width frontal test and the potential of hard contact to the driver knees in the mobile progressive deformable barrier MPDB test. Meanwhile, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are only available from the top-spec Essence 64 variant. Good results were determined from its front AEB cyclist system, but had mixed results for some vehicle and pedestrian detection scenarios. The rating applies to all MG 4 variants, except the X-Power hot electric hatch which is all but confirmed for Australian launch later this year. ANCAP is also expected to soon start subjecting vehicles to the stricter testing criteria.

The budget-friendly EV scored maximum points for protecting adult occupants in the side impact and pole tests, with a mix of good to marginal results in the full-width frontal and frontal offset tests. Penalties were applied for excessive forward movement of the rear passenger dummy in the full-width frontal test and the potential of hard contact to the driver knees in the mobile progressive deformable barrier MPDB test. Meanwhile, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are only available from the top-spec Essence 64 variant. Good results were determined from its front AEB cyclist system, but had mixed results for some vehicle and pedestrian detection scenarios. The rating applies to all MG 4 variants, except the X-Power hot electric hatch which is all but confirmed for Australian launch later this year. ANCAP is also expected to soon start subjecting vehicles to the stricter testing criteria.

Mg4 ancap

The passenger compartment of the MG 4 Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but some structures in the dashboard were thought to present a hazard for occupants of different sizes or to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection of all critical body areas. However, analysis post-test analysis of the film showed that the head of the rear passenger dummy had moved forward more than is recommended, and protection of that body area was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, all critical parts of the body were well protected and the MG 4 Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side was poor. The MG 4 Electric does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However the rear seats scored no points for whiplash protection as the centre position in that row lacks adequate head restraint.

Belmont go karts

Rare right-hand-drive Cadillac up for sale Sat 24 Feb 0. Henry is a motoring journalist passionate about the intersection of technology and transportation, with a focus on electric vehicles. Tweet 0. Meet the family. The budget-friendly EV scored maximum points for protecting adult occupants in the side impact and pole tests, with a mix of good to marginal results in the full-width frontal and frontal offset tests. Please select whether or not you require a loan car. Drop Off Time 7. Ineos Fusilier electric and hybrid 4WD unveiled. He is a mechanical engineer who spent the first 7 years of his career building transport infrastructure before starting carloop. Fri 23 Feb 0. Please select your preferred date. Your vehicle safety questions, answered! Gallery 3. Last Name.

The MG 4 Electric is fitted with a range of collision avoidance technologies including autonomous emergency braking, active lane support, and fatigue monitoring. Mixed results were seen in AEB Pedestrian test scenarios. AEB Backover functionality, designed to detect and respond to pedestrians in reverse, is not available.

Henry Man. Chat with Agent. City Cars. Media Contact. Finance Guide. Selling Advice. New Car Calendar. Penalties were applied for excessive forward movement of the rear passenger dummy in the full-width frontal test and the potential of hard contact to the driver knees in the mobile progressive deformable barrier MPDB test. The MPDB test - which also assesses vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility — showed that the MG 4 Electric presented a relatively low injury risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle, with a modest penalty of 0. Ineos Fusilier electric and hybrid 4WD unveiled. Isabella Kendall. New Models. Advertise with us. Family Cars Guide. MG4 received high scores in a few of the 4 key areas.