Lcp max vs shield plus

Log in. Sign up.

In fact, the overall length 5. Even with its widened magazine, the grip width of the LCP Max is just 0. Both guns are listed at The glass-reinforced nylon grip narrows near the top, providing a shallow channel for the thumb and trigger finger. Besides its broad-shouldered profile, the metal magazine also features improved feed lip geometry.

Lcp max vs shield plus

These guns are very small, holding only six rounds in the magazine. They are not much fun to shoot. For the most part, this gun is going to be a lightweight tool used for pocket- or inside the waistband concealed carry. The gun goes from double-stacked to single-feed with a rather drastic bevel that makes it very easy to insert the magazine. What you see is what you get: a standard polymer grip. Overall, it is a little bit fatter than what you would expect from other pocket pistols due to the round capacity. The gun is comfortable to hold and it fits into the web of my hand well. It is a little bit smaller, but I have no complaints about the overall ergonomics of this firearm. It feels about like to grit sandpaper. If you have really small hands, I can see how this gun might be a little bit on the larger side, but if you have very large hands, this might be one of the few pocket pistols that you can hold reasonably well.

I was excited to get this gun out to the range. Featured Products.

When it was introduced in , the only other competition on the market was the Kahr series of pistols. However, this paled compared to the much smaller Sig P, which held ten rounds of 9mm. This is not a large enough gun to use for duty use. Somebody could carry this gun as a backup on duty, but it definitely would not be a primary firearm. There are multiple methods by which you can conceal carry a firearm.

Log in. Sign up. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. Sort by Oldest first Oldest first Newest first Most reactions. Does the magazine well in the grip have enough space for the additional length of the Super? Is the brass ejection port in the slide large enough to allow a Super cartridge to pass? Is the chamber in the barrel heavy enough to handle the increased pressure of the Super round? Is there enough space to accept a larger recoil spring to handle the increased force of t e Super?

Lcp max vs shield plus

Ruger introduced the LCP in and it was a great success, taking over the concealed-carry market. They felt the trigger was too long and that some other features of the gun were subpar. The Ruger LCP continued to be wildly popular while its second-generation sold very well in turn. There are also two other dimensions that are drastically different.

Balaji plywood & hardware

I like both pistols and can shoot both very well for their intended purpose. These seem to be no different. Popup content starts Reviews by. More recoil than other loads but worth it for the penetration and expansion. Ryan says:. I agree with you Isaac. The Sig P I was also trying out held consistently at 1. It was much larger than the Khars and slightly larger than the shield. December 31, at am. I will stick with my original LCP with ball or hollow point rounds that almost match the profile of ball ammo.

Smith and Wesson Shield Plus. We gun people are a hard crew to win over.

August 6, at pm. Somebody could carry this gun as a backup on duty, but it definitely would not be a primary firearm. This gun is light enough and slim enough that it rides close to the body under light clothing without printing. With the optional 12rd. Barry McDonald says:. It blends into the body. You can get recoil spring assemblies and such reasonably, and obviously, the sights are the same. Earlier LCP pistols came with rudimentary sights, but the new sights on the LCP Max are a significant step up in terms of quality and practicality. This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Ed Taylor says:. These seem to be no different.