Censored for betas

If you're a current Beta Safety user, censored for betas first thought on seeing this was probably "Isn't this what Beta Safety already does? For many Beta Safety users, your current experience is probably fine, and if that's the case then feel free to stick with it! Beta Safety and Beta Censoring each have their strengths and weaknesses, so feel free to make your own decision. The points discussed below except where it says otherwise are generally referring to the "backend" part of Beta Safety, censored for betas, not specifically the Chrome extension.

Beta Censoring is a simple ish app for on-demand detection and censoring of NSFW images, designed especially for betas. Beta Censoring itself is something of a middleman. Under all the covers, Beta Censoring uses the NudeNet AI model to classify images on demand then returns censored versions of the same images. Essentially, something requests an image to be censored more on the something below , Beta Censoring will load the image, run some prep work then run it through the open-source NudeNet model to detect specific body parts or features. Then, it will censor the image according to the results from the AI and the supplied preferences and return a censored version of the original image. Beta Protection is designed from the ground up to be a flexible bells-and-whistles-included solution for classifying and censoring images from anywhere. That being said, the most common use case is in conjunction with the Beta Protection Chrome extension.

Censored for betas

.

Based on my current testing numbers, a second low-resolution low-framerate GIF would take around 5 minutes to be censored. The runtime we use ONNX has support for multiple forms of acceleration, censored for betas I simply don't have the right combination of OS and hardware to test it.

.

In it's current form, you don't really use Beta Censoring in the traditional sense. You leave it running and other apps we call them 'clients' can interact with it, requesting images to be censored. That does mean that you need to leave it running though, as clients will need to contact the running server to request censoring. If you're a more advanced user, Beta Censoring can be configured as a Windows Service or Systemd service to have the server running, but not visible. There is a simple web interface available to check on the status of a running Beta Censoring server though. At present, this status panel is just to check on your server details, performance and configuration though more features are planned. At this time, the only known Beta Censoring client is Beta Protection open in new window , the browser extension for live censoring images while you browse. Beta Censoring can accept any client though, and if you're interested in integrating it with other tools or building your own client, the developer documentation includes more details. The best place to look for known issues with Beta Censoring is the GitHub issues open in new window.

Censored for betas

If you're looking into modern auto-censoring apps, you will probably have seen three names being thrown around: Beta Safety, Beta Protection and Beta Suite. There's a whole comparison for Beta Safety available here , but this page is intended to deliver a brief summary of how Beta Protection and Beta Suite compare. To be clear, neither option is inherenly better than the other. Beta Suite is a great bit of software and if it meets your needs, use it! This won't try and change your mind, just give you an idea of where each software's strengths lie. The most notable difference between the two that we'll just call Protection and Suite from here out is in their scope: Protection is a censoring extension for the browser , while Suite is intended as a system-wide censoring capability. Suite can be set up to censor your whole screen in real-time and that's something that Protection was never designed for and will never support. Instead, Protection focusses on doing in-browser censoring while you browse the web as well as possible. Protection thanks largely to its reduced scope will censor notably slower than Suite will, but has a fraction of the hardware requirements.

Igloo trailmate marine cooler

Based on my own admittedly minimal testing, Beta Safety will usually be slightly faster in pure censoring time, but at the cost of dramatically more memory usage and often more CPU usage. As such, Beta Censoring chooses to only support static images. Additionally, there's a few features that got put in the "get-back-to-that" bucket that need to be finished like improvements to sticker support, and some much-needed refactoring. Beta Safety and Beta Censoring each have their strengths and weaknesses, so feel free to make your own decision. That being said, the most common use case is in conjunction with the Beta Protection Chrome extension. To be clear, it currently works and works pretty well, but there's just a lot more I intend to do with the project. Introduction Beta Censoring is a simple ish app for on-demand detection and censoring of NSFW images, designed especially for betas. There are some features from Beta Safety that Beta Censoring doesn't include, either a case of "not yet" or deliberate choice. Beta Censoring offers very fine-grained control of censoring so that clients can offer the most options. If you're a current Beta Safety user, your first thought on seeing this was probably "Isn't this what Beta Safety already does? As of v0. This is a big one so hard to explain succinctly, but essentially every part of the Beta Censoring experience is more configurable and adaptable than it's counterpart in Beta Safety. Open Source and Extensible Beta Safety is a closed-source proprietary tool. You can find a ton more information on Beta Censoring's performance, including how to monitor and tweak it, in the performance docs. Open source software means you can always see the code and moving parts that make the app work, you can always tweak, modify or customise the app at will, and the community is free to contribute features, changes or fixes to the project.

This site includes the documentation required to get started with the extension as well as some more background information on the extension and how it's built.

For many Beta Safety users, your current experience is probably fine, and if that's the case then feel free to stick with it! Beta Censoring includes its own built-in web interface for checking on the status of the server, providing limited information on requests, checking on loaded assets or monitoring the performance of the server and all of its components. The points discussed below except where it says otherwise are generally referring to the "backend" part of Beta Safety, not specifically the Chrome extension. Status and Monitoring Beta Censoring includes its own built-in web interface for checking on the status of the server, providing limited information on requests, checking on loaded assets or monitoring the performance of the server and all of its components. Customisation This is a big one so hard to explain succinctly, but essentially every part of the Beta Censoring experience is more configurable and adaptable than it's counterpart in Beta Safety. To be clear, though, the two apps are not strictly tied together:. Alternatively, if you have a beefy rig and don't mind your PC working a bit harder, add some more workers and caching, and revel in the faster response times. Hypothetically, a high-framerate p video just 15 seconds long would take almost an hour. There are some features from Beta Safety that Beta Censoring doesn't include, either a case of "not yet" or deliberate choice. Then, it will censor the image according to the results from the AI and the supplied preferences and return a censored version of the original image. The list below usually reflects the current state of that feature gap. If you request a GIF to be censored, the server will censor the first frame and return it as a static image.